Why Spirit Airlines soars and Bank of America flounders. A Tale of Two Fees.

Spirit Airlines charges a fee for everything and continues to grow profitably, while Bank of America cannot make a $5 debit fee stick.  It’s all about the relationship your brand has with your customers that matters most.

In November, Bank of America announced plans to impose a $5.00 per month debit card fee.  Consumer advocates howled, and even President Obama criticized the fee. Organized consumer protests developed.  Within a short time, BoA scrubbed the plan.  Said David Darnell, co-chief operating officer. “Our customers’ voices are most important to us. As a result, we are not currently charging the fee and will not be moving forward with any additional plans to do so.”  Whether BofA was hearing the voices of customers or politicians, you have to wonder why the bank was so surprised at the fallout.  Banks have become an easy target, but much of it is a mess of their own making as they have forfeited their customer relationship on behalf of the industry forces driving the acquire and go big strategy.

Spirit Airlines recently became the first airline to charge a fee for carry-on bags- from $30 to $45 a pop.  Yet it is still flying at 90% capacity and in 2011 earned a whopping $2.1 million per plane!  U.S. Airways earned a paltry $.21 per plane.  Spirit also charges $5 to print a boarding pass at the airport and $3 for a bottle of water and $4 for peanuts. Says Spirit Chief Executive Ben Baldanza, “If you’re going to bring a lot of bags, fly Southwest.”  When you add up all the fees, sometimes other airlines offer a cheaper total cost.  The secret in Spirit’s sauce is that their fee-based pricing structure takes out cost as travelers require fewer desk agents, take fewer bags, and lighten the weight of the plane to save on fuel.  Seating is crowded because they squeeze more rows in with less leg space.  Flights are often late because their schedule is based on 30 minute turnarounds.  But for those whose money is more valuable than their time, and might not be able to travel at all if prices are higher, Spirit offers a unique, clear and valued proposition.

It’s not whether you charge a fee or not, but rather the context in which your customers view your actions.

  1. Know whom you serve.  Ben Baldanza and Spirit Airlines know exactly who their target is: the super budget non-business traveler like hair stylist Kristin Flood, whose only baggage was stuffed beneath the seat on a recent flight. As she said in a recent WSJ article, “We fly Spirit whenever we can. We just pack as little as humanly possible.”  Service fees are not inherently evil and need not be a lightning rod for consumer or political attack.  When they work to inform behavior for the right target customer, in transparent fashion, they serve a valid market function.  In Spirit’s case, it is to keep costs and prices as low as possible at the expense of comfort and convenience.  Its travelers understand this.
  2. Earn their trust by serving them well over time.  New research from The Relational Capital Group shows that customers relate to brands the same way they do to people.  Brands, like people, earn trust by behaving in ways that show their intentions are worthy (warmth) and that they have the capability to act However, when intentions are perceived as unworthy, like those of the big banks, a level of mistrust and suspicion develops to the point where even a simple debit card fee triggers a negative response, inviting your competitors (and politicians) to fan the flames.

The branding and business lessons you should learn.

  1. Your brand’s persona and relationship with your customers is the great enabler or inhibitor.
  2. Be transparent and consistent about whom you are serving and why.  Do not betray their trust.
  3. Stay focused on the customer target segment your brand serves.  You can’t please everybody.
 Click here to download whitepaper on Brand Warmth and Competency.
Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bill Draper’s Ten Traits of a Winning Startup Team

The business model is, of course, important.  But for Bill Draper, legendary Silicon Valley venture capitalist, more critical is the quality of the people and the makeup of the entrepreneurial team. Over 50 years of experience in the business has taught him the trademark characteristics that increase the odds of success.  “No one person is likely to embody them all, but the collective team members ideally should,” he told a standing room only crowd at the Angel Venture Fair in Philadelphia on May 1.

  1. Optimism.  Entrepreneurs must have a fundamentally optimistic view of the world.  This should be grounded in realism, but having a positive belief in the future is a prerequisite.
  2. Courage.  Being an entrepreneur is not easy and requires breaking new ground, often in the face of naysayers, name-callers and critics of all kinds.
  3. Detail oriented.  Bill mentioned this third, although he did not say the list was in order of importance.  Suffice it to say, someone on the team has got to have the capacity to focus on relevant detail to ensure strategic validity and executional excellence.
  4. Persistence. Whether speed bumps or a crevasse, the startup team will encounter obstacles and experience failure.  The strength and fortitude to bounce back is critical, whether on the same path or pivoting in a new direction.
  5. Empathy.  Who will facilitate relationship-building, both internally to build the team, and externally to find partners and close deals?
  6. Fun/happy culture.  Bill acknowledged this may be a bit of a throwback idea, as he thinks a lot of the fun has gone out of startup work today due to a much more competitive environment and the expectations of investors.  Nevertheless, a fun work environment that creates happy employees can drive exceptional performance.  He cited Zappos, in which he was an early investor, as exhibit A.
  7. Brainpower.  There is no substitute for haveing smart people on the team, with the knowledge, education and expertise to move the business forward.
  8. Character.  Know what behavior is required when.  Show integrity and make principle-based decisions.
  9. Sharing.  If the founder is not willing to share generously in the success of the business and recognize the contributions of others, it is like poison in the well.  Sharing is one of the keys to #6.
  10. Willingness to work hard. Those who work hard tend to create their own good fortune.
  11. Visionary.  Ok, this is the 11th, but Bill mentioned this at the end as well.  The kind of visionary he looks for is not a futuristic dreamer, but rather someone who keeps the company’s mission, goals and direction in focus, adjusting them as necessary along the way.

Of course, any business of any size would also benefit from these same characteristics.  Bill’s driving point is that because starting a company is so hard and the odds of succeeding generally so low, knowing how to insightfully bet on people is a strategy that has served him and his investors very well.

 

Posted in Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy, Innovation, Leadership, New Business Launch, Organizational Effectiveness | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

5 Reasons why SnipSnap for Coupons is a Big Deal.

Mobile apps continue to change our world in big ways and small.  Now a new coupon app, SnipSnap, enables shoppers to have their printed coupons with them in their smartphone.  And that’s not all.

What is SnipSnap? 

SnipSnap is the first mobile app to let you scan, save and redeem printed coupons on your smartphone.  No more fumbling for crumpled coupons or regrets about leaving them at home.  A user snaps a picture of the offer and the app scans and parses the coupon value, bar code, expiration date and images.  Users can then search and retrieve coupons at checkout, and get location-based and expiration date triggered notifications.  Users can also access coupons snapped and shared by friends or uploaded directly by partner manufacturers.  The app is now available as a free download on the AppStore and will soon be available for Android as well.  I attended two events this past week where founder Ted Mann, a former Gannett exec, pitched his app against others- he took first place both times.

Why is SnipSnap significant?

  1. Experience re-imagined.  SnipSnap is a classic example of how routine behaviors and tasks performed by millions every day are transformed by mobile app technology.  This is but one example among thousands of how mobility, connectivity and powerful data capability combine to deliver a whole new experience.
  2. App Ease.  Ted Mann had an epiphany six months ago and now has a game-changing app ready to download.  With the aid of easy-to-use design software Keynotopia he created his first version of the software to test viability, then hired an engineer and designer to create the version he envisioned.  New apps like CloudMine will make app creation even easier in the future.
  3. Industry disruption.  SnipSnap has great acceptance with many retailers such as Target and Bed, Bath and Beyond. It has little penetration in the grocery store industry today, but that will change.  The only question is whether Sunday FSI coupon giants Valassis and News America will rush their own mobile apps to market or purchase a company like SnipSnap.
  4. Coupon Centric Consumers.  From cents-off grocery store coupons to deep deal purveyors like Groupon, consumers are drowning in deal offers and being trained to never buy without a coupon.  Digital deals, whether via email, text, location-based services or new apps like SnipSnap, make having a coupon with you when you want to use it the new norm.  The digital proliferation of coupons presents a strategic pricing and merchandising challenge to manufacturers and retailers.
  5. More Big Data.  SnipSnap will have access to terabytes of consumer purchase and behavior data at the user level.  The opportunities to mine and utilize this data for new insight and targeted offers is almost endless, although managing and harnessing ‘big data’ is a major challenge.  Catalina currently serves this need for the grocery industry by capturing checkout scan data at the user level over time via loyalty card id.  SnipSnap can now do the same thing for user-specific purchases made with coupons via smartphones across retailers and channels, something retailer checkout-based loyalty card systems like Catalina cannot do.

The ‘facebook of couponing?’

The big question is whether one user interface platform, whether SnipSnap or another, will capture enough users quickly enough to establish itself as the ‘facebook of couponing.’  If so, the potential to transform the industry is staggering.  Smartphone penetration is fast approaching 50% and within two years 80% of web searches will be via smartphones or other mobile devices.  It is inevitable that the coupon industry, currently dominated by print, will shift to digital due to accessibility, flexibility, immediacy, cost and metrics.  Will consumers want to manage their digital coupon and deals from one central platfom app or manage separate apps from a multitude of vendors?  Ted Mann is not competing with Mark Zuckerberg today, but he has created a great new app that coupon-clipping consumers will love to use.  Click here to see learn more about SnipSnap.

Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy, Innovation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Dollar Shave Club. Why Gillette should worry and what you can learn.

The Dollar Shave Club has attained a lot of visibility on YouTube and in the press.  Some might think it is just another viral video story.  But the truth runs much deeper and this business strategy just might succeed.

Dollar Shave Club is a startup ecommerce business offering men’s razors cheap: from $3 to $9 on a monthly subscription basis, shipped to your door.  Customers sign up for one of three plans that give them a razor and a supply of blades every month, from twin-blades to a four-bladed or even six-bladed razor.  Founder and CEO, 33 year old Michael Dubin, created a humorous and on-the-mark video, which has been viewed over 4 million times on YouTube.  Over 12,000 men signed up in the first 48 hours.

Why Gillette isn’t worried.

Gillette dominates the razor and blade business, with 66% share of a $12.8 billion global market.  In an April 12 WSJ article, Gillette spokesman Damon Jones said his company isn’t worried about losing marketshare, in part because other subscription-based companies have tried and failed.  “If you want to spend 10 bucks a month, we have Gillette products available at all of those pricepoints,” he said.  If price were the only pain point, Jones might be right.  After all, 15 Gillette Mach3 cartridges can be purchased for as low as $2.06 each on Amazon.com, if the buyer agrees to recurring shipments.  So what’s the rub?

Why Gillette should worry.

What DSC is all about is simplicity and backlash.  Men generally hate to shop.  Many go to great lengths to extend the life of their blades to cut down the monthly cost.  ’Stop paying for shave-tech you don’t need!’ pines Dubin in the video.  What Dubin is saying in his own funny, irreverent way, is that the Gillette’s of the world have been inventing ever more complex new razors and raising price every year to pad their pockets, not serve your needs.  The appeal of DSC is not only that it is easy and saves you money, but that buying a razor from them is a very public way of saying to Gillette, ”I’ve had it and I’m not going to take it anymore!’  This goes beyond price points to a much more fundamental identification with the brand and Michael Dubin.  If DSC razors, with lubricating strip and pivoting head, and its service levels, are good enough, repeat business and strong cash flow will follow.

Why has The Dollar Shave Club raised $1 million in funding from saavy venture-capital firms Andreessen Horowitz and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers?

These guys are not stupid.  Gillette is truly a great brand and has earned every share point.  Yet, in following the classic CPG playbook to drive value for its investors via ever greater revenue and profits, Gillette has left many dissatisfied and disengaged users in its wake.  When someone comes along like The Dollar Shave Club and changes the dynamics of the playing field by tapping into a deep consumer sentiment that is easily understood and shared, what you get is not just a funny viral video, but a potential game-changing business model. If DSC can make it work for razors, what other categories might they shake up?

What this means for you.

  1. Nobody can sleep soundly in the new ecommerce internet world.  New business models can pop up overnight from anywhere with a relatively modest investment, and with the right value proposition and brand positioning, can cause headaches for even the largest companies.
  2. Brand identity, personality and values are still incredibly important to consumers.  Tapping into them in a genuine and authenic way, to the relevant target market, is the path to sustained profitability.
  3. Consumers feel overwhelmed and stressed.  Simplify their lives in some meaningful way while saving them some money, and they will reward you.  Serve it up with a little well-done humor in a way that says ‘we understand,’ and they will embrace you.

Click here to watch the DSC video.

 

Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy, Innovation, New Business Launch | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What true leadership looks like: S.A. Ibrahim, Radian CEO

‘It’s all about people,’ says, S.A. Ibrahim, CEO of the $7 billion re-insurer Radian.  Short, balding and stocky, he does not project as a leader until he starts talking about the principles that helped him lead Radian through the perilous period of the mortgage market implosion.

Radian is very fortunate to still be in business.  Many of its former competitors have shut down.  This is easy to appreciate when you consider that Radian’s business is reducing risk for home mortgage lenders, buyers of municipal bonds and buyers of Credit Default Obligations (CDO’s).  The role of its mortgage insurance business, its largest division, is to take the credit risk out of mortgages sold to home buyers who put less than 20% down.  Wells Fargo is its largest customer.  S.A. Ibrahim stepped in as CEO in May of 2005, less than a year before the first signs of trouble in the home mortgage market began to surface.  The company not only survived, but has an AA rating (better than many countries), with $7 billion in assets, $110 billion in credit exposure, and 30% of the mortgage re-insurance business.

How did he do it?  S.A. would be the first to tell you that it was not what he did, but rather what his people did.   “Creative, imaginative, dedicated people who do not accept defeat can overcome obstacles that you thought you could never handle,”  he said at a business networking event on March 21 .  His team had to deal with things they never encountered before and maneuver in unknown territory.  They stopped writing bond insurance and focused on the mortgage business.  S.A. credits CFO Robert Quint with recommending a technical reorganization of the business units that sounded crazy at first, but proved to be a critical factor in the firm’s ability to handle losses and survive the cash crunch.

S.A. Ibrahim’s Principles of Leadership

  1. Exude confidence and optimism during times of crisis.  Wear a smile into the building.  Be aware that how you behave and what you say will be amplified throughout the organization.  This does not mean showing false bravado, but rather creating a supportive and reassuring atmosphere that encourages sustained commitment and productive work.
  2. Be a cheer leader.  Find the best in everyone and build on individual strengths.  This will enable people to do more than they or you ever thought they could.
  3. Maintain your own standards of business judgement.  In a rapid growth or high pressure business environment, competition is likely to engage in questionable strategies or practices.  As the trend builds, the pressure to join the crowd and suspend your own better judgement becomes enormous, but you can’t do something just because everyone else is.
  4. Find the right formula to reward and motivate.  Often, the corporate reward system is too closely tied exclusively to stock price growth.  Sometimes this growth happens due to factors totally extraneous to the firm’s activity.  Sometimes the stock price fails to increase despite magnificent work on the inside.  S.A. found ways to reward people and keep them motivated even in dark times.

Radian is poised to reach ‘the finish line of profitability’ as its profitable post 2009 ‘new book of business’ grows and the losses on its ‘old book of business’ diminish.  S.A. attributes much of his personal strength and success to his roots in Hyderabad, India’s fifth largest city, where he grew up.  His Sunni Muslim family was in business, surrounded by Hindus, Muslims and sub-sects observing many different holidays, or observing the same holidays with different practices.  Perhaps that is where he learned to appreciate what it takes to get along with and recognize the value of the people around him.

 

Posted in Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy, Leadership, Organizational Effectiveness | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Innovation and the ‘Industry Expert’ Trap

Innovative thinking and effective problem solving often require ‘outsider thinking.’  In fact, the naive question is often the key to unlocking new opportunity.

In an essay in the WSJ on March 12, John Lehrer discussed the latest learning on effective innovation.  Among the many findings of recent research was the value of ‘outsider thinking.’  An analysis of solutions posted on InnoCenter, a crowdsourcing innovation website for scientific problems, showed that chemists were able to solve molecular biology problems that stumped the molecular biologists.  While the chemists’ knowledge was close enough to grasp the problem, it was not so close that it impeded creative thinking.  As outsiders, the chemists could ask the naive question, which can be a tremendous advantage, but the molecular biologists could not, precisely because they were ‘experts.’  “It is the ability to attack problems as a beginner,’ says Lehrer, ‘to let go of all preconceptions and fear of failure, that’s the key to creativity.”

Seeing a problem in a new light or connecting a solution to the problem it was seeking (PostIt Notes), often requires ‘mental restructuring,’ which is promoted by asking a completely new kind of question.  The ability to connect seemingly unrelated elements is enhanced by diversity of thinking, which is often a product of exposure to diverse experiences.  As Lehrer points out, the key to Apple’s succes was ‘connecting things’ that already existed in a new and better way.  Gutenberg invented the printing press based on his experience pressing wine.  The Wright Brothers airplane prototypes were based on their knowledge of building bicycles.

How to avoid the Industry Expert Trap

The temptation to build your team with, or seek consulting advice exclusively from your ’industry experts’ is strong, but probably wrong, if effective innovation is a core strategy.  While poets cannot be expected to solve rocketry problems, finding people with the core skills to understand your business and apply a new perspective and knowledge base is something to consider.  A former supervisor of mine was fond of saying “the most value a new hire offers is in the first six months of employment- after that they become one of us.”

  • If you are more conservative, seek specialists and experts in your industry with diverse experience somewhere in their backgrounds.
  • If you are more aggressive, seek people who can relate to and function effectively in your world, but who bring an ‘outsider’ frame of reference.
  • The bigger the innovation challenge or prize, the more alert you should be to the danger of the industry expert trap.

 Read the full WSJ article here.  Online subscription may be required.

Posted in Business Strategy, Innovation, Leadership, Organizational Effectiveness | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Is the Trust Factor growing or killing your business? Part 2

Trust has always been a critical factor in the customer buying decision, only now it is more critical and visible than ever.  Have you assessed your brand/company ‘trust factor’ and its impact on your business? 

In Part 1 of this post, we discussed how to build trust and what destroys it.  But trust can mean something very different, depending on the category and what is at stake for the customer. In this post, we address these remaining questions:

  1. How much and what kind of trust are required to enable purchase in your category?
  2. What depth of trust must your brand achieve to be a leader?

The risk and consequences of making a bad purchase defines the threshold level of trust required for a purchase decision.  Trust is measured along a continuum. Here are some considerations that impact where your category and brand plays.

  1. Substitutability.
    • Food and Home & Beauty products are easily tried, evaluated and repurchased- or not.  The cost of a bad decision is low.  If unhappy, you buy something else next time.  Some level of trust is required for purchase, which will vary by occasion, but is on the lower end of the continuum.
  2. Ease of trial.
    • It is not easy to test out a bed, dishwasher, furnace, replacement windows, or air conditioner before purchase or installation.  Cost is significant.  Returning or replacing the item is difficult.  The cost of a bad decision is painful and endures, often for years.  Trust is required at different levels by category for factors like quality, performance, customer support, and safety..
  3. Future performance.
    • You hope you never have to find out if the airbags in your car were installed properly, but you will never know until you need them.  You will never know how well your life insurance policy was handled by your representative and company- period.  You can’t verify the future, but you do want to have confidence that the airbags and insurance will perform as expected.
  4. Depth of commitment/dependence.
    • Products or services that are used in an integrated way, as part of an ecosystem, are very costly to replace or difficult to duplicate.  Companies must have a high level of trust in Salesforce.com’s reliability, security, support and longevity to use that service.  Once they buy and embed it into their sales process, the cost of switching to another system can be staggering.

Determine the necessary scope and depth of trust for your brand to win.

  • Gather data on what consumers are saying about your brand, competitors and category.  Evaluate reviews, listen to conversations, create forums on your website for questions and discussion.  Talk to your customers on Facebook, Twitter or wherever they digitally reside.  Conduct customer satisfaction surveys for your brand and the competition.  Be sure to focus on your target customer.
  • Determine what attributes of your product or service are most critical- these drive the depth of trust required for purchase. Rank your brand’s trust factor for these critical elements in absolute and relative terms.  Score your findings and see where the category and the competitive brands fall.
  • If your brand or category rank low on a critical trust factor, focus on the problem and fix it.  The problem may be the fit of performance to promise.  If so, either improve performance or refine your promise.  The problem may be difficulty of trial or verification.  If so, consider upgrading return policies or warrantee programs.  Do all you can to provide as much information, testimonials or other reassuring cues that impact trust.  After taking action, make sure people know about it so your brand gets the credit.

The ‘know… like… trust’ buying paradigm is still in force.  Scoring high on trust is rewarding at many levels.  Think about how people, products and services you trust save time/energy, reduce stress and add to the quality of every day life.  If you do this for your customers they will love you and do more business with you.  But, you do have to earn their trust and then work hard to keep it.

Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Competitive Strategy, Leadership | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Is the Trust Factor growing or killing your business? Part 1.

Trust has always been a major factor in the customer buying decision, only now it is more critical and visible than ever.  Have you assessed your brand/company ’trust factor’ and its impact on your business?

According to the 2011 Edelman Trust Barometer, over the past 12 months  85% of respondents said they bought products or services of a company they trusted, while  conversely, 73% said they refused to buy products or services from one they did not trust.   The depth of trust required for purchase depends on the category and what is at stake.  Where does this leave your brand?

There are three questions you must consider.

  1. How do you build trust and what destroys trust?
  2. How much and what kind of trust are required to enable purchase in your category?
  3. What depth of trust must your brand achieve to be a leader?

Building and destroying trust.

  • Never before has performance been more transparent and shareable.  Social media is the new word-of-mouth and user product reviews are the new Consumer Reports.  Failing to respond to problems posted in blogs and forums can damage your brand’s reputation in a heartbeat and erode trust.  Consumers are doing their homework before they buy.
  • Deliver on your promise.  Brands must set clear product or service performance expectations and meet them.  Advertising hype is not a substitute for a value proposition, well communicated and well executed.  Customers, like bosses, don’t like surprises.  They just want their problem to be solved.
  • Understand who your target customer is and focus narrowly.  This is not so much about demographics as the user persona, the skills or capacity required to use your product or service, and what it does best.  More sales to the wrong target provide short term revenue, but when these unhappy folks return product, complain in public forums, and berate your service staff, it is a lose-lose situation.
  • Customer support must be great.   Customers want to know that you will be there for them when they need your help.  Responding within 3 minutes to 95% of the calls to customer support may be terrific, but even a handful of customers left on hold for 30 minutes, who post complaints to highly visible sites, can undermine hard-earned trust.
  • The best defense is a good offense. Solicit testimonials and conduct customer satisfaction surveys to post and share.  Get your expertise and thought leadership out there in front of consumers via blogs, newsletters, Facebook, webinars, YouTube videos and Twitter chats, depending on where your customers hang out digitally.

At the highest level, trust is a function of two things: intent and competence.  Customers need to believe that the people running the business have the intent to serve their interests fairly and have the competency and resources to do so.  Your job is to create a body of evidence, appropriate for your category, that gives your target buyer reasons to believe in and trust your brand.

We will address questions 2 and 3 above in Part 2 of this post.

Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Retailers in trouble. What you should learn from Target Stores ‘showrooming’ brouhaha

The retail strategy that has served Target Stores so well for so long won’t work going forward.  Ditto Best Buy, Barnes & Noble…

Online retailers are eating its lunch, but Target does not have an answer.  So it has sent a letter to major vendors requesting help to fight the online-only competition by providing pricing support or offering unique products.  Target no longer wants to be the ‘showroom’ where consumers learn about products only to then go purchase them more cheaply someplace else, especially from online vendors with a lower cost structure, no sales tax (Amazon), or a loss leader strategy (Amazon again).

Target Store's Milford

“What we aren’t willing to do is let online-only retailers use our brick-and-mortar stores as a showroom for their products and undercut our prices without making investments, as we do, to proudly display your brands,” according to the letter, which was signed by Target Chief Executive  Gregg Steinhafel and Kathee Tesija, Target’s executive vice president of merchandising.  WSJ, 1-23-12

Gregg Steinhafel is a smart guy.  This is a not-so-veiled threat to major brands to play ball with Target or else.  Given its size, Target can expect some vendors to comply with this request, although it will create a retailer relations minefield for manufacturers and confusion for consumers.  There are only so many custom lines a manufacturer can provide, and simple cosmetic differences or UPC changes will not cut it, as the digital social world will expose this quickly.  Something has got to give.

Steinhafel knows this.  Therefore the guess here is that he is playing for time.

  • Buying online will only improve as an experience and become second nature.  Displaying products in store, as the Zappos model has proven, is of ever diminishing value.  Sales online were 2% of total in 2000 vs. 8% today, and grew 15% this past year.  What won’t consumers buy online?
  • The ultimate defense for retailers is to control the brand and the category.  Therefore, we are headed for seismic shifts in the retailer – manufacturer landscape that will force companies to make strategic choices and commit to strategic alliances regarding product and brand distribution.
  • Alternatively, retailers will crowd out branded manufacturers by sourcing their own products.  While this is easier to do in some categories than others, e.g. Trader Joe’s in food, flexible manufacturing and creative thinking will open up other, more challenging categories such as consumer electronics and housewares.

Here are the strategic implications for you as a vendor or retailer:

  1. Be vigilant to continually evaluate your business model, especially for threats from the digital space.
  2. Be quick to identify where direct and indirect competitors may be vulnerable, and act.
  3. Be ready to forego existing relationships, forge new alliances, and embrace strategic choice.
Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Business Strategy, Competitive Strategy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SEO Basics for the non-SEO Expert, Part 2

Content and Relevancy are the keys to SEO success.

Think about your content as living in two buckets: On-Page focused vs. Off-Page focused.  When it comes to SEO, the Off-Page focused content is most important because, as discussed in Part 1 of this topic, generating inbound links to your website will drive higher ranking- as much as 75% of the search ranking result.

Getting found via Google, bing, Yahoo, Ask

1st page SEO ranking

  1. On-page focused content.
    • This is familiar territory- the information you provide on your website to prospects who have found you and are now working their way through the buying process, utilizing the content you provide to answer their questions and, if an eCommerce site, to make a purchase.
    • Once they have found you, your goal is to keep them engaged in an easy, friendly, helpful flow of content until they convert, be it downloading a white paper, signing up for a newsletter, requesting to be contacted, or making a purchase.
  2. Off-page focused content.
    • This is generally less familiar territory- the information you provide not only on your website, but also via Facebook, YouTube or Twitter, whose primary purpose is to be shared because it is valuable, entertaining or helpful in some way.  When this happens, links back to your website appear on other websites, blogs, email or retweets.  These inbound links are the gold in the sifting pan.
    • Ideally, this content will be directly relevant to your product or service- think the BlendTec videos on YouTube that have been viewed 185 milion times.  Or, you might create a thought leadership piece of content related to your area of expertise that is worthy of being shared.
    • However, this content may have only indirect relevance to your product or service. For example: a Subaru dealer website might post a) amusing pictures of where cars wind up when they skid during winter storms, or b) a listing and pictures of the potholes to be wary of in a metro area, c) links or reports on weekend traffic to ski resorts in the mountains.  You get the idea- the more valuable or entertaining the better.

Your SEO ‘to do’ list.

  1. The basics are still important: identify key search words that work for your business and utilize them in page descriptions, titles, tags and content.  But this will get you only so far, depending on your category and competitive set.
  2. Create great content that others will want to share.
    • Blog- both your own and as a guest blogger.  According to Dan Zarella at Hubspot, blog regularly and blog more often to gain more visitibility and higher ranking.
    • Think beyond the written word- use pictures, videos and podcasts.  Video is proven to weight more heavily in search and when done well, be more engaging.
    • Post your content to your Facebook page and Tweet.  Include social media links that make sharing easy.
    • Comment on posts of relevant and influential bloggers; listen to and join relevant #hashtag topics on Twitter.  Again, include links to your blog/website when you participate, but be helpful to the community discussion- don’t sell.
    • Generate PR via web releases or relevant journalists and bloggers.  Send samples.
    • Give stuff away- yourself or via others.  ‘Free’ is still one of the most powerful words in the English language.

SEO work is never done.  Whether you are doing it yourself or managing an SEO agency, keep the big picture in focus and know what action steps make a difference.

Posted in Brand and Marketing Strategy, Content Marketing, SEO | Tagged , | Leave a comment